{"id":3093,"date":"2024-04-24T01:46:40","date_gmt":"2024-04-24T01:46:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thepilule.com\/?p=3093"},"modified":"2024-04-24T01:55:59","modified_gmt":"2024-04-24T01:55:59","slug":"reimagining-masculinity-new-paths-for-21st-century-men","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thepilule.com\/en\/reimagining-masculinity-new-paths-for-21st-century-men\/","title":{"rendered":"Reimagining Masculinity: New Paths for 21st Century Men"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
Men are not robots, but they need an update. Yet, it’s not necessarily the one we think. There’s a lot of talk about deconstructing masculinity on the internet, in the press, in politics, and at universities. The message is clear: if a man doesn’t accept abandoning traditional masculinity, he won’t fit into the New World of progress. But what does this “deconstruction” really mean?<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

On the other side, conservatives resist. They uphold the non-deconstructed man and praise traditional masculinity, which alarms the politically correct. In the midst of all this, there’s the average man: increasingly single, having less sex, and giving up romantic relationships altogether. This generation of men hasn’t turned into Buddhist monks; in other words, they haven’t chosen solitude, they endure it.<\/p>\n

So, to come out of this and become men of value again, should they deconstruct their masculinity or revert to traditional masculinity? The first option seems like suicide, the second, utopia. Fortunately, there’s a third way.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Table of Contents<\/p>\nToggle<\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n